The legalization of marijuana was a problem for quite a while, but since Governor Schwarzenegger opened the door to serious debate of this topic as a fix to California’s financial issues it has getting more attention than ever. Amsterdam is generally mentioned as the model for legalization, but any proponent who has researched the Amsterdam results would realize that using it since a version defeats their purpose.
Instantly after Amsterdam’s legalization of www.trythecbd.com marijuana, there was no change from the number of people using it which is being used like a rebuttal to those who think more folks might smoke if they can get it legally – however things changed radically afterwards.
Over the next several decades, as marijuana became commercialized, usage rose by 300%. At that moment, 44 percent of teenagers aged 18 to 20 said they’d used it, and also the amount that had done so within the past month more than doubled. That, and other problems, generated stricter laws being passed.
To justify that the legalization it’s also become politically incorrect to express that there is anything wrong using bud and also police who state they are aware of’an enormous quantity of young people strongly dependent on soft drugs, with all the consequences…’ have their hands tied as those issues do not, lawfully, exist.
Anybody who thinks things is going to be another in America has to look at what’s happened with prescription drugs. Since their commercialization (direct to consumer advertisements ) became prohibited, prescription drug abuse is now the nation’s second largest cause of departure. And that is just for illegal use. In addition, we have a massive growth in prescription drug use with people visiting their doctor asking for pills they have seen advertised – that the drug companies are doing more treatment than the health practitioners.
What will happen with legalization of marijuana? In this realm of opportunity, you may safely bet whatever you have including your vehicle, house, job and children that people is going to be jumping at the chance to sell marijuana faster than a pharmaceutical company may pounce on a brand new DSM IV diagnosis.
There are lots of studies that prove marijuana is addictive (even though one might not become physically dependent on it), it induces disassociation, psychosis and schizophrenia, and it is connected to lung damage and various ailments.
As is normally true with winners of almost any cause, proponents of legalization insist on ignoring these particular studies and elect to trust information that supports their origin. And that information stinks, also. The question is this: Can we really want to take the chance?